SEO, GEO and conversion
AI answers now sit above Google and take clicks that used to reach your site. I audit what keeps you from ranking, being cited and converting: technical SEO, schema, security, accessibility and GEO, with the fix for every finding.
Free, no signup, results in seconds.
Prefer a person to look? Ask for a diagnosis, free, by email. No pitch attached unless you ask for one.
For companies that depend on search and want to be cited by AI, from SaaS products to online stores, media and service businesses.
Four steps, and you can stop at any of them.
14 automated checks on your own URL: technical SEO, content, security and GEO.
The checker only looks at your home page. The full audit goes through the whole site: technical SEO, schema, security, accessibility, conversion and GEO.
An example result. Yours shows your own site, with a link to fix each problem.
Who's running this
I spent two years doing SEO and content for Venngage, a SaaS product, in English, Portuguese and Spanish — the same work the companies I audit are doing right now, from the inside.
Before that, six years running online content at Grupo Bandeirantes — one of Brazil's largest broadcast and media groups — where search was the difference between a story being read and not.
And before any of that, seven years building crawlers — automated systems that pulled, parsed and republished regulatory content from government agency sites. That's why this isn't a checklist. It's a pipeline I wrote, and it has now audited more than 2,200 domains — here is what they show. All of it is in the data section, including a directory of 25 AI crawlers.
SEO gets you into a list of blue links. GEO — generative engine optimization — decides whether an AI assistant names you when someone asks it a question instead of searching. The mechanics overlap, but not entirely: a site can rank well on Google and still be structurally impossible for an AI to cite.
The five items listed above, checked by hand against your live pages, with a summary by email: the actual lines from your robots.txt, the schema types present and missing. The full audit goes further: indexing, architecture, security and accessibility.
The diagnosis only points them out, and it's free. If you want the fixes, there's a fixed-scope repair above. Plenty of people take the diagnosis and hand it to their own developer, which is fine.
Usually in minutes. It's two lines in a text file. The harder part is everything downstream: being crawlable is necessary, not sufficient.
The checker and the diagnosis are free: it's how I show the work rather than describe it. The full audit and the repair are priced per site and quoted with the findings.
14 checks, in seconds. No signup.
Run the free checkPrefer a person to look? Ask for a free diagnosis.